Vladimir Balabkin with family and friends in front of the Amur Regional Court, December 2023

Other

Appeal in Blagoveshchensk Mitigated the Punishment for Pensioner Vladimir Balabkin and Released Him from Custody

Amur Region

On December 19, 2023, the Amur Regional Court released 71-year-old Vladimir Balabkin from custody. The court reclassified his actions from Part 1 (organization of extremist activity) to Part 2 (participation in such) of Article 282.2 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and imposed 1 year of suspended imprisonment. He had spent 96 days in a pre-trial detention center.

A panel of three judges chaired by Natalya Trofimova considered an appeal against the verdict of the court of first instance, which found Vladimir Balabkin guilty under Part 1 of Article 282.2 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. The milder second part of the same article made it possible to reclassify the actions of the believer and release him from custody in the courtroom. His sentence is considered suspended.

Three months earlier, the judge of the first instance of the Belogorsk City Court, Natalya Kramar, sentenced an elderly believer with deafness and a serious stomach disease to 4 years in prison. Immediately after the verdict was announced, Vladimir was arrested in the courtroom, and before the appeal he was in pre-trial detention center No. 1 in the Amur Region.

The believer disagreed with the guilty verdict, found many violations in it and appealed. He drew attention to the fact that it was impossible to establish from the verdict on what basis the court considered the regular worship of Jehovah's Witnesses as a continuation of the activities of an extremist organization. According to the explanation of the Supreme Court, it is allowed to practice the religion of Jehovah's Witnesses in Russia.

Balabkin also stressed that the verdict was passed in violation of international law: "For example, the court did not apply the provisions of Article 18 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, according to which everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion. This right includes ... freedom to manifest one's religion and belief, either alone or in community with others and in public or private."

In the Amur Region, 13 of Jehovah's Witnesses have already received from 6 to 8 years in a general regime colony for participating in worship services.

The case of Balabkin in Belogorsk

Case History
In March 2021, an investigator of the FSB Directorate for the Amur Region opened a criminal case against Vladimir Balabkin, a pensioner suffering from cancer. A day later, searches were carried out at six addresses in Belogorsk. Since April 2021, Vladimir has been on the Rosfinmonitoring list, which has created significant difficulties for him in obtaining a pension. The investigation blames the peaceful believer with organizing the activities of an extremist organization for discussing the Bible with friends and acquaintances. The case went to court in April 2023. The accusation was based on the testimony of a man who, on the instructions of the FSB, conducted covert video filming of worship services of believers. In the autumn of the same year, the court sentenced Balabkin to 4 years in prison, he was taken into custody in the courtroom. However, on December 19, the appeal reclassified Balabkin’s actions from Part 1 to Part 2 of Article 282.2 and reduced the sentence to 1 year probation. He was released in the courtroom.
Timeline

Persons in case

Criminal case

Region:
Amur Region
Locality:
Belogorsk
Suspected of:
"organized meetings of followers of religious organizations" (from the decision to initiate a criminal case)
Court case number:
12107100001000009
Initiated:
March 2, 2021
Current case stage:
The verdict entered into force
Investigating:
Branch of the Federal Security Service of Russia in the Amur Region
Articles of Criminal Code of Russian Federation:
282.2 (2)
Court case number:
1-292/2023
Court of First Instance:
Белогорский городской суд Амурской области
Judge of the Court of First Instance:
Наталья Крамар
Case History