Illustrative photo

Illustrative photo

Illustrative photo

Actions of Law Enforcement Officers

In Vladivostok Three Believers Arrested After Searches at Homes of Jehovah's Witnesses

Primorye Territory

*Text updated on March 9, 2023.

On March 5, 2023, security forces raided at least 10 addresses in Vladivostok as part of a criminal case for belief. Yuriy Byche, 37, and Sergey Novoselov, 54, are in pre-trial detention, and Yegor Pogrebnyak, 27, is under house arrest.

According to the Directorate of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation for the Primorskiy Territory, the believers “using the ZOOM application... carried out actions aimed at continuing the activity of an extremist organization.” This is how the investigation interprets the conducting of peaceful meetings for worship. A criminal case was initiated under three parts of the extremist article at once — the organizing the activity, participating and involving others in it (parts 1, 1.1 and 2 of Article 282.2 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation).

Officers of the Investigative Committee, together with the FSB Border Control, launched a special operation early in the morning. According to eyewitnesses, the security forces handcuffed Yuriy Byche, threw him to the floor and kicked him several times. The investigator intended to connect to the believers' online call and film their conversation on video. He demanded passwords for phones and other equipment from Yuriy.

In another case, security forces seized electronic devices, postcards, notebooks with personal notes, and other items from believers.

The ECHR judgment of 7 June 2022 states that “the Russian authorities have failed to put forward anyelements which, according to the Court’s case-law, could have warrantedinterference with the applicants’ rights to freedom of religion, expression or association.” (§ 158). This position is shared by the founder and director of Human Rights Without Frontiers (HRWF, Brussels, Belgium) Willy Fautré: “Statistics about the magnitude of the repression are disturbing. Freedom of religion or belief is the cornerstone of all freedoms.”

The Case of Byche and Others in Vladivostok

Case History
After searches and detentions in Vladivostok in March 2023, Yegor Pogrebnyak was placed under house arrest, while Yuriy Byche and Sergey Novosyolov were held in a pretrial detention center. Soon, Tatyana Kazakova, Marina Roslova, Anastasiya Dyldina, Yelena Romanova, Tatyana Maz (case separated), and Alina Tkachenko (case dismissed) also became defendants in the criminal case under the extremist article. In December, new searches took place, after which Kirill Chekolaev was arrested. He spent about five months in a pretrial detention center; Novoselov and Byche — almost a year. All three were released under a ban on certain actions. In April 2025, charges were brought against Anatoliy Baranov and Kirill Krymskiy. They, as well as Dyldina and Pogrebnyak, were additionally charged with financing the activity of an extremist organization. In June, the case went to court.
Timeline

Persons in case

Criminal case

Region:
Primorye Territory
Locality:
Vladivostok
Suspected of:
"being on the territory of the city of Vladivostok ... carry out actions of an organizational nature to convene and hold meetings, directly participate in meetings, as well as to involve persons in the activities of an extremist organization, aimed at continuing the activities of a religious association", "realizing their criminal intent aimed at financing extremist activities, transferred funds" (from the decision to initiate a criminal case).
Court case number:
12302050030000008
Initiated:
February 26, 2023
Current case stage:
trial in court of first instance
Investigating:
Investigative Department of the Investigative Committe of the Russian Federation for the Primorye Territory
Articles of Criminal Code of Russian Federation:
282.2 (2), 282.3 (1), 282.2 (1.1), 282.2 (1)
Court case number:
1-137/2026 (1-270/2025)
Court of First Instance:
Frunzenskiy District Court of Primorye Territory
Judge of the Court of First Instance:
Oksana Krasko
Case History
Back to top